Check out the podcast here!

If you’ve ever felt like youth ministry is harder in your church than it “should” be—like you can’t get buy-in, you don’t feel supported, or every new idea feels like pushing a boulder uphill—there may be a simple reason: Your church has a leadership personality. And that personality quietly shapes everything: decision-making, expectations, speed of change, support systems, and what success looks like. In this episode, the hosts unpack four common “church types” they’ve observed through years of ministry and conversations with youth pastors across the country. No church fits perfectly into a box, and many have overlap—but recognizing your primary “type” can help you lead with less frustration and more wisdom. Below are the four leadership personalities—and how they affect your youth ministry.

1) The Freedom First Church

Values: creativity, autonomy, innovation. A Freedom First church is marked by trust and flexibility. Leaders tend to give staff lots of room to lead without micromanagement.

You might be in a Freedom First church if:

• You hear: “We trust you—just run with it.”
• Your youth ministry calendar is 100% self-built.
• You’re not always sure who approves what.
• Meetings are rare, short, or optional.
• Nobody asks for reports, metrics, or documentation.
• Every ministry “does their own thing.”
  
  

Strengths:

• Youth pastors are trusted and empowered.
• New ideas are welcomed.
• Ministry can pivot quickly with culture and student needs.
  
  

Challenges:

• Lack of alignment or oversight can create drift.
• If something goes wrong, leadership may notice late.
• Youth pastors can feel isolated, unsupported, or unsure.
• The freedom can carry a heavy weight of responsibility—if it fails, it feels like “it’s on you.”
  
  

Core idea: You have room to run—just make sure you’re running in the right direction.

2) The Stability First Church

Values: heritage, consistency, reliability. Stability First churches love what’s proven. They’re often built on “this is how we’ve always done it,” and change usually takes time, meetings, and approvals.

You might be in a Stability First church if:

• Change requires lots of runway.
• Decisions go through meetings, votes, or layered approvals.
• Leadership emphasizes: “Let’s take our time and do it right.”
• The calendar is predictable year after year.
• Systems are dependable—but innovation feels slow.

A funny (and painfully real) example: needing approval for something as small as replacing curtains in the youth room.

Strengths:

• Systems are tested and dependable.
• Expectations are clear.
• Students benefit from steady rhythms and long-term discipleship culture.

Challenges:

• Slow to adapt, even when change is needed.
• Creativity can feel boxed in by tradition.
• Leaders can resist change simply because “it’s always been that way.”

Practical hope if you want change here:

• Build proof of concept—tell stories and show fruit.
• Stay stable yourself; long-term trust often opens doors for long-term change.
• Control what you can control: make disciples well, and let fruit speak.

Core idea: You have a strong foundation—change takes time and patient trust-building.

3) The Relationship First Church

Values: community, care, belonging. Relationship First churches genuinely feel like family. They prioritize people, warmth, and togetherness—often asking how decisions will affect relationships.

You might be in a Relationship First church if:

• You hear: “Let’s make sure everyone feels cared for.”
• Decisions are filtered through, “How will this impact relationships?”
• There’s strong camaraderie among staff and families.
• Volunteers are chosen more for who they are than their skill set.
• Everyone knows everyone—but clarity is sometimes missing.

There’s a nuanced point here: choosing volunteers for character can be a strength (you can train skills, but not humility). But it can also create complications if relational politics determine who gets placed where—even when they’re not a good fit.

Strengths:

• Youth pastors feel known, supported, encouraged.
• Students experience warmth, safety, and belonging.
• Care is tangible (prayer chains, real support, consistent presence).

Challenges:

• Feelings can drive decisions more than strategy.
• Roles and expectations blur.
• Loyalty can outweigh honesty, letting problems grow unnecessarily.
• Addressing misalignment is hard when “everyone is connected.”

Core idea: You have a deeply connected family—but families need clarity to stay healthy.

4) The Mission First Church

Values: purpose, goals, strategic impact. Mission First doesn’t mean other churches lack mission. This is about leadership style: everything connects to vision, strategy, goals, and outcomes—often with clear definitions of “success.”

You might be in a Mission First church if:

• Everything ties to vision and strategy.
• Wins and goals are defined and reviewed regularly.
• You hear words like “alignment,” “execution,” and “outcomes.”
• Meetings are efficient and purpose-driven.
• You’re resourced—but expectations are high.
• Staff feels tired from the pace.
• Relationships matter, but mission tends to win when there’s tension.

The hosts also point out an important tension: tracking outcomes can be healthy (even the book of Acts records numbers), but it can become unhealthy if people start feeling like numbers.

Strengths:

• Everyone pulls toward the same vision.
• Priorities and expectations are clear.
• Youth ministry feels integrated and supported.

Challenges:

• High clarity often brings high pressure.
• Fast pace can wear staff down.
• Metrics can overshadow relationships if not guarded carefully.

A thoughtful side conversation emerges here: working hard “for a season” can be valuable—especially early in ministry—if it’s paired with wisdom, boundaries, and long-term sustainability. The goal isn’t burnout; it’s learning capacity, giving your best to the mission, and then learning how to dial back as life seasons change.

Core idea: You’re aligned and resourced—but you must guard people, pace, and priorities.



So… What Type of Church Are You In?

The encouragement at the end is simple: identify your church’s leadership personality so you can lead more effectively inside that reality.

If you’re frustrated because your church doesn’t operate how you wish it did, this framework gives you language—and a path forward. Each type has strengths to celebrate and challenges to navigate. The win isn’t labeling your church; it’s learning how to shepherd students faithfully in the context you’ve been given. And if none of these fit? The hosts invite listeners to chime in—maybe there’s a fifth type they haven’t named yet!